Skip to main content

1 Samuel 17-20



1 Samuel 17 provides an alternative description of Saul and David’s first meeting. In 1 Samuel 17:12 we read, “Now David was the son of an Ephrathite of Bethlehem in Judah, named Jesse, who had eight sons.” This is said as though we have never met David before, even though David has already been introduced in 1 Samuel 16. Then, at the end of chapter 17, Saul asks who David is, as though he has never met him, even though in chapter 16 David plays the lyre for Saul. The only reasonable explanation of this is that we have here two different sources on the life of David that are being combined in the narrative of 1 Samuel. The second source begins with the famous story of David and Goliath.
Though Michelangelo’s sculpture of David is indeed a stunning work of art and well deserving of all the praise that has been lauded upon it, that sculpture is really not in keeping with the depiction of David in this passage. In Michelangelo’s sculpture we are presented with a David who is super-human, more than life size. There is no doubt that such a David would have been able to wipe out Goliath without batting a single stone eyelash.
However, the David we meet in 1 Samuel 17 is a mere boy (although ruddy and handsome in appearance, Michelangelo would be glad to know). This David has no experience with armor and thus rejects the extra weight and protection of Saul’s offered kit. Shepherd-boy David trusts more in his sling and five smooth stones from the wadi than he does in the armor or sword of a king. However, more than anything else, the boy David trusts in “the name of the Lord of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel”.
The account of David and Goliath is beautifully written. We can imagine each step, and even each facial nuance in the confrontation. No wonder that this single story in Scripture has provoked the work of artists down the centuries, perhaps more than any other tale from the Hebrew Scriptures. Furthermore, this story has given inspiration to countless “little guys,” both individual and political entities, going up against the giants of the world. It would appear that the political powers that be in Florence five hundred years ago had a political purpose in commissioning Michelangelo’s statue of David in the first place. (See: Michelangelo's David.)

1 Samuel 18-20 regales us with the story of the relationship between David and Saul’s son Jonathan. The king’s son is present when David presents the head of Goliath to Saul. We read:
When David had finished speaking to Saul, the soul of Jonathan was bound to the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul…. Then Jonathan made a covenant with David, because he loved him as his own soul. Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that he was wearing, and gave it to David, and his armor, and even his sword and his bow and his belt. (1 Samuel 18:1,3-4)
I cannot think of any other description in the Bible of such extreme love and devotion between two human beings. We are told twice that Jonathan loved David as his own soul. Of course, Leviticus instructs us all to love our neighbors as we love ourselves. However, something more seems to be going on here for “Jonathan was bound to the soul of David”. Moreover, he makes a covenant with David as well, though we are not told the nature of this covenant. Then Jonathan does the amazing symbolic (?) deed of stripping himself of his own clothing, armor, sword, belt, and giving it all to David. Is this something that mere friends do for one another? Later on in chapter 18 we are told that Saul’s daughter Michal “loved” David, but that expression of love is rather barren compared to Jonathan’s effusive one.
Jonathan’s love for David continues despite his father’s growing animosity and intention to kill his young warrior (1 Samuel 19:1). Then, in 1 Samuel 20:17, Jonathan makes “David swear again by his love for him; for he loved him as he loved his own life.” Thus, we are now informed that the love is mutual.
When Jonathan speaks up for David at the height of his father’s anger against David, Saul's anger extends to Jonathan as well. Saul says to his son, “You son of a perverse, rebellious woman! Do I not know that you have chosen the son of Jesse to your own shame, and to the shame of your mother’s nakedness?” Why is Jonathan a shame to his mother’s nakedness? Why does Saul’s attack have this sexual edge to it?
After this incident, Jonathan goes to his pre-arranged meeting with David to warn him of Saul’s intentions. At this meeting, the two kiss each other and weep together and we read that: “David wept the more”.
Looking ahead to the deaths of Saul and Jonathan, we find in 2 Samuel that David composes a formal lament for them, one to be taught to the people of Judah. In the conclusion to that lament David says,
I am distressed for you, my brother Jonathan;
greatly beloved were you to me;
your love to me was wonderful,
passing the love of women. (2 Samuel 1:26)
The nature of the love between Jonathan and David has not only been questioned in recent times, but down through history. You can read more about that here: David and Jonathan. Whatever the nature of that love, whether it be friendship, agape, or something with tinges of Eros to it, there is no question that it was a great and beautiful love, one that every human being could only wish for in a relationship with another human being. I mean: would not everyone be blessed to have a friend who would die for them? In fact, we do have such a friend. His name is Jesus....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London.

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van&

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior photos o